I might compile more coherrent thoughts of Super Bowl XL and the commercials therein, but I wanted to get a post up regarding my initial thoughts.
If I was a Seahawks fan, I would have been very upset with the way the game was marketed and then run inside the game. One of the cool features ABC did was to have players tell what winning the Super Bowl would mean for them. I loved that feature, but there was only one feature of a Seahawks player out of around six. All others were Steelers.
The calls did not go Seattle’s way either. There were many calls that I don’t know what the refs were thinking. If they were balanced, then no problem, but I don’t think they were.
Yes, I picked Seattle to win and was rooting for them. That said, I am hardly upset with the outcome of the game so the above judgements aren’t taken from someone who was wanting to catch discrepencies in calls or promotions.
The commercials were rather weak this year. Budweiser, as always, had the most unique, humorous and memorable commercials. I like the revolving wall and the young clydesdale pulling the wagon with the help of the other clydesdales from behind. It pushes both the product and stays in tune with their previous campaigns.
Go Daddy tried to build off of last year’s commercials and I thought their commercial this year, which ran twice, wasn’t that impressive. Go Daddy doesn’t have enough of memorable advertising campaign to make second-year commercials, though they tried.
I still can’t figure out why Diet Pepsi paid all of that money to the various celebrities for such a lousy campaign. What was really odd about the Diet Pepsi commercial with Jackie Chan is that they showed their competitor, Diet Coke, but didn’t exactly make that product look inferior. That used to be taboo in advertising, and I don’t think times have changed in that regard.
The Burger King commercial was just odd. Coming from a company who had used old footage in their commercials which ran during NFL games all year, they could have done much, much better than to stage some sort of weird song and dance routine with people dressed up as lettuce, pickles, a hamburger and a bun. That single commercial was very, very strange to me.
Your thoughts on the game and/or commercials?
Update (Mac): You can watch all the commericals at Google Video (including an option to watch all of them back-to-back–about 20 minutes long). My favorite was the Bud “flasher” ad. Simple but funny and everyone can relate to it.
Update (Chad): Where was the Master Lock commercial? They usually have one per year during the Super Bowl, but I didn’t see it this year. The flasher ad was funny, but I would have loved to see paint on the sheep with some web address on it like the flasher who was at the Super Bowl last year or the year before, I can’t remember which.





Win some, lose some. I agree, the Burger King commercial was strange and a little disturbing. My favorite was the naked sheep streaker. But it must not be very effective, because I don’t remember what the product was that they were selling. I would think that the true way to judge a commercial would be how much in sales they produced. But for entertainment quality, there have been better years.
Comment by Debbie — Sunday, February 5, 2006 @ 9:49 pm CST
The Burger King commercial was just utterly pointless. It was over and I asked myself why Burger King spent all that money on essentially nothing.
The GoDaddy commercial really stunk it up. It made no sense whatsoever even after last year (and I like GoDaddy).
Budweiser did a good job as usual and I really enjoyed the fact that Al Michaels mentioned the support the troops campaigns that they do.
As for the game, it was one of those Super Bowls with only a handful of decent plays. The 75-yard Willie Parker run and the ridiculous interceptions stand out the most. However, it was only the third Super Bowl ever where the winning team had more turnovers than the losing team.
I’m glad Pittsburgh won; Jerome Bettis and Bill Cowher deserve their rings. However, it wasn’t nearly as good as the Super Bowl two years ago.
Comment by Chris Short — Monday, February 6, 2006 @ 6:37 am CST