Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-Oz) was expected to outline a plan to deny all funding to the war in Iraq, something in which has been rumored to be making the rounds in the Democratic leadership, but Kucinich also was expected to call for a United Nations-led military force inside Iraq.

To no one’s surprise, Kucinich didn’t exactly say which nations would fill such a UN force or how the United Nations having no military could send a military force to Iraq. It’s not known if Kucinich has planned out how many soldiers UN member states could send to Iraq, nor if he wants the United States to partake in such an excursion.

Also to no one’s surprise, Kucinich did not say how the United Nations should better patrol peacemakers acting as pimps and fornicators to a nation’s 12 year-old girls.

In reality the United Nations should have had a greater role in Iraq, but following an Al Qaida in Iraq bombing of the UN’s headquarters in Baghdad on April 20, 2003 the UN pulled completely out of Iraq. Now those diplomats weren’t the fighting type therefore they couldn’t exactly keep the peace in a nation ridden with sectarian strife and terrorist attacks from global Islamist organizations, but at the first sign of adversity the UN cut and run.

Now Kucinich wants the United Nations to handle all ‘peace-keeping’ duties in Iraq? The organization still hasn’t filled UNIFIL with a paltry number in comparison the number of soldiers needed for Iraq.

UPDATE: Apparently on Neil Cavuto’s show, Kucinich states “you can’t win the war militarily.”  Of coruse he was speaking about Iraq.

If you can’t win in Iraq militarily, then why would Kucinich want the United Nations to move a military force into the nation to ‘keep the peace?’