Regular readers know I am a Newt Gingrich for ‘08 supporter, but since Newt hasn’t declared and there’s a good chance he won’t declare, I’m pretty solid in Giuliani’s camp. Personally I don’t care about the so-called issues that will keep Conservatives from voting for Rudy. I’m a Conservative and I support him.
The primary issue for me isn’t the Second Amendment, Roe v. Wade or whether or not Rudy once wore a dress for a comedy skit (McCain did too). I actually think the latter bodes well for both candidates that did because it shows they are willing to laugh at theirselves, unlike a certain politician who ran opposite of President Bush in ‘04 whose botched jokes were at the expense of others.
Taxes and how the nation combats Islamism are primary for me, and I think they are connected. A high increase in taxes will result in a drop for support to fight Islamism, that is unless you are of the impression the government should function as an employer too. Quite obviously, I do not.
Giuliani spoke in front of the Stanford University’s Hoover Institution over the weekend and reiterated why I am supporting him. Giuliani said the GWOT had done “damage” to the image of the United States, something that is quite certain but for different reasons than critics of the war have mentioned thus far, and proposes on how to correct that wrong impression.
“We have to say to the rest of the world, ‘America doesn’t like war,’” Mr. Giuliani said. “America is not a military country. We’ve never been a militaristic country,” he added, saying national leaders have fallen into an “analytical warp” by defining the battle as a war on terrorism and not, as he deemed it, a “war of the terrorists against us.”
On taxes and how to fund the war:
Democrats, he said, would want to raise taxes to pay the higher costs of a war. “That shows a dividing line, and to me, a misunderstanding of how our economy works,” Mr. Giuliani said. He said that while Republicans believe that the American economy is “essentially a private economy,” Democrats “really believe, honest, that it is essentially a government economy.”
Giuliani also proposed to rename the Republican Party to the “party of freedom,” but to do so would require explanation on his account to erase the constant smears of what it means to be a Conservative. A Conservative, at one’s core, is the limitation of government in all facets of life, because a Conservative believes the less government, the better and more free.
It is this, dare I say it, Reagan-esque quality that I see in Giuiliani. And I must admit, it makes me rather excited as Reagan was the first president to serve while I was alive and had developed a memory (I was two when Reagan took office). I am a Reagan Conservative.





I’m sold on Rudy too. Don’t worry about the social issues either. He is saying all the right things to court Reagan conservatives. He promises he will choose judges from the same pool as Alito and Roberts; none of this Harriet Meyers crap. He claims he will be a federalist when it comes to gun control and I have no reason to doubt him.
Look for the media to play up his social liberal reputation, thinking it will fool middle-America into not voting for him in the primary. Boy they don’t want to see Rudy run circles around either Obama or Hillary (take your pick) in the debates.
Comment by Jimmy the Dhimmi — Tuesday, February 27, 2007 @ 8:28 pm CST
Yeah, I heard he wants constructionist judges, but he’s also explicitly said he will not go against the social issues Conservatives favor.
He’s such a gifted orator, or articulate if I can call him that and not be called a racist, that he would do very well against another gifted orator and articulate person in Obama. There’s little question in my mind what America wants most in 2008 is a leader and an orator, therefore I think Obama will skate away with the DNC nomination.
And you’re right as usual, Jimmy. Every bad angle that can be spun against Rudy will be, and I await some bombshell that will come out from having his playbook stolen/lost/whatever. It’s trickling out now, but it will come out when it is most important to for the opposition.
Comment by Chad — Tuesday, February 27, 2007 @ 9:21 pm CST
I will have to respectfully disagree with you both.
I don’t trust him, and will never support his campaign.
Candidates can say any kind of shiite. His record as an elected official, along with comments like the one in the link, tell me what I need to know.
I will only support a genuine, certified conservative, not a pretender.
Comment by no2liberals — Thursday, March 1, 2007 @ 8:14 am CST
After reading this report, I trust Rudy even less than before.
Comment by no2liberals — Thursday, March 1, 2007 @ 9:18 pm CST