Iran is still holding 15 British sailors hostage in Tehran, and it appears as if the sailors might be tried for espionage.
A website run by associates of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, reported last night that the Britons would be put before a court and indicted.
Referring to them as “insurgents”, the site concluded: “If it is proven that they deliberately entered Iranian territory, they will be charged with espionage. If that is proven, they can expect a very serious penalty since according to Iranian law, espionage is one of the most serious offences.”
There truly is no question the abduction of the 15 sailors was intentional and it firmly appears the sailors were within Iraqi waters. Christopher Isham reports in The Blotter the abduction was the result of a United States raid in Irbil, Iraq where five IRGC commanders were captured, and that the Iranians will use the British sailors as bargaining chips to secure the release of the IRGC commanders.
But lost in this mix is the former Iranian general Ali Reza Asghari. Asghari was either taken hostage while in Turkey or he defected. The exact cause as to Asghari’s disappearence, to which it is still the great unknown where he is, remains a mystery, however Iran is convinced Asghari was detained against his will. It is Asghari who would have first-hand knowledge of how Hezbollah is constructed and what steps, if any, Iran has taken to advance the cause of Hezbollah in the event a war does break out over Iran’s nuclear program. Asghari would be, in my opinion, the more valuable bargaining chip. And it is not unlikely Asghari is the key piece to the Iranian hostage-taking puzzle, regardless whether he defected or was taken hostage.
We’ve seen Hezbollah take Israeli soldiers hostage in hopes of a prisoner exchange as recently as this past summer. It was the incident that culminated in war between Israel and Hezbollah and the two Israeli soldiers, assuming they are still alive, are still being held against their will. Hezbollah’s demands were generally whitewashed by the international press and we were told rather generic demands on the behalf of Hezbollah to secure the release of the captured Israeli soldiers. Hezbollah wanted the release of Samir Kuntar, a man who murdered an Israeli parent before his four year-old child’s eyes prior to bashing in her skull with his gun.
Asghari is not necessarily of the same ilk as Kuntar, however Asghari is widely credited with forming Hezbollah and helping it grow. Just like the Hezbollah desire to secure the release of Kuntar only surfacing in the back channels, the fate of Asghari might be the same.
The Iraqi government has stated the Brits were acting in Iraqi waters, and the Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zibari has called for the immediate release of the British hostages. It appears as if the IRGC violated Iraqi sovereign waters to take hostages, which could easily be seen as a declaration of war.
Then comes in British Prime Minister Tony Blair who stated the following:
At a European summit in Berlin, Blair said Iran’s claim that the sailors had crossed into Iranian territorial waters “is simply not true.”
“I want to get (the situation) resolved in as easy and diplomatic a way as possible,” Blair said, but added he hoped the Iranians “understood how fundamental an issue this is for the British government.”
Compare England’s reaction towards Israel’s reaction. Margaret Thatcher is no longer on Downing Street.





As per this post over at Captain’s Quarters:
Seems like Mahmoud is talking about of his arse again. Does he really want to openly, brazenly and defiantly want to violate the Geneva Convention with sanctions and embargoes looming over his already poor populace?
Comment by DeWaun — Monday, March 26, 2007 @ 2:26 pm UTC
While I am hardly learned in the Geneva Convention, I will assume for the sake of argument Ed’s statement is correct. That still does not mean Iran will not try the sailors for espionage in a show trial. It is exactly how Ahmadinejad works, and he’s contributed to a show trial before (1979 of course). It works to his favor to parade these sailors in front of Iranian state-run television, though I seriously doubt it will get that far.
The issue seems to be pretty transparent, and there will likely be an exchange done pretty soon. If so, once again Iran will have learned a valuable lesson. It is O.K. to make a provocative move without fear of any repercussion.
Back to your question of if Ahmadinejad wants “to openly, brazenly and defiantly want to violate the Geneva Convention with sanctions and embargoes looming over his already poor populace.” He’s doing that with Iran’s nuclear program, or at least risking harming the Iranian populace. Why wouldn’t he do the same for another issue?
Then again, it’s hard to get a good read on the mind of Ahmadinejad. He has two split personalities; one that he parades around for the Western media and populace to see and the other where he freely calls for war and is as defiant as ever. It matters then, I think, what face he chooses to show once more pressure is placed upon Iran for the return of the British sailors.
Comment by Chad — Monday, March 26, 2007 @ 3:48 pm UTC
when we all politics to rule us we are in d chits
Comment by LiamMichael — Friday, March 30, 2007 @ 10:48 pm UTC