All-Seeing Eye has a post up at The Jawa Report laying out the facts in Qana, Lebanon as we know them, but I also think he has missed some crucial details. In brief, he lays out the following facts as known now.
This fact is easily explained as buildings can and do collapse after being struck . . . structural damage and what not that engineers could explain better than I.
- Around 50 people died, or at least 50 corpses were found. In that approximate seven hour window, did no one in Qana go to the building to either find bodies or help any survivors? The building was still standing.
This is almost impossible to believe. While I have never lived in a warzone, and thankfully so, if I lived in an apartment building that was hit by a bomb, I’m getting the hell out of dodge once I try to find other survivors. I’m not going to walk outside, look at the building and go back inside to go to sleep. This should be a survivor instinct that we all have.
Other questions arise that I have. Witnesses claim there were two explosions; one from the bomb and another one or two minutes later due to an unknown reason. Was this an ammo dump by Hezbollah? It doesn’t make any sense for the IAF to strike the same location twice with the power of bomb they have been reportedly using. Furthermore, if the IAF goal was to knock the building down, even if the second explosion was from an IAF bomb the building still stood errect and would have needed to be hit by at least one more bomb. There have been no reports of a third, fourth or fifth explosion.
Within a couple of hours after the news hit, elaborate banners were unfurled in Beruit. I am no artist, but I have quite a bit of experience in ordering banners to be made and getting artwork done for various projects. Two hours is not nearly sufficient enough time to get a banner such as this one processed, made and set up for the protest. Sure, the banner might have been pre-made for other reasons or other protests, but it just happened to be displayed on the date of the Qana strike? On a bit of a side note, the image in that banner looks very much like what Obsession talked about too, eh?
With the estimated 50 dead, they were all women and children. Do men not sleep in the same quarters in Qana? Being as Qana is described as a Hezbollah stronghold, or at least was, it is reasonable to conclude most of the residents are Shia Muslims. It would be strange to have so many unmarried mothers in one building anywhere, but in a region where Islam reigns supreme it would be sacreligious. Are we to conclude that the men were able to flee the building while the women and children were not and no man cared to try to help women and children get out of the building?
Perhaps all men were Hezbollah operatives and trying to find new places to fire rockets? Even so, we’ve all seen the videos of Hezbollah rocket firing within towns and the subsequent fleeing into a building and if there were 50 dead, it’s reasonable to conclude there were at least 12 full families involved. All 12 families have a father who is in Hezbollah’s military wing?
The Associated Press supposedly arrived just minutes after the building collapsed. With the wreckage in infrastructure all over Lebanon, why would a bombed building be newsworthy unless it was demolished and there were 50 civilians? It wouldn’t be, or at least any more so than the countless others. What was the emphasis on traveling to Qana to see this particular bombed building over, say, the 10 or so others that were hit overnight?
Qana was the scene of what has been called an “Israeli massacre” in 1996. Israeli shelled Qana after, what else, rockets were fired from within a refugee camp into Israel. Qana has a special meaning to Hezbollah because they know this one incident in 1996 help push the world more to their side. Out of all of the towns in Southern Lebanon, Qana had to be the one hit where 50 civilians died thus revoking the ever-present memory of 1996? The 1996 Qana strike was a boone for Hezbollah, would they ensure they saw another one with, according to Israeli Prime Minister Ehmud Ohmert, two-thirds of their missile launchers destroyed?
Hezbollah knows full well it cannot defeat the Israeli military in a conventional way, but they can and are winning this in terms of public relations. Iran knows this too. There should not be this many inconsistencies when this story has received front-page treatment accross the globe. The story is bound to overlap and fill in the gap if one were to cull together all reports on the incident, but they don’t. Why not?
In no way am I saying this was a Hezbollah public relations move because I don’t know, but it at least should be considered. There have been a number of convenient factors related to this entire war that it is mentionable that this incident that will likely define the war should be looked at and questioned.
Hyscience linked with
Just Wondering...